Monday, August 5, 2013

Our PCs Hate These People

Question: How do you handle Hod in your games? Does he come up? Is he the'elephant in the room no one talks about or what? Does he hate Baldur? Also, how does Odin get along with his various children? Does he have a soft spot for them, or is he a king first and a father second?

Aww, Hod! Hod has actually appeared as a major character in our games, thanks to both Geoff Matheson's and Aurora Dahl's bands being heavily involved in Ragnarok and the events leading up to it. If you're interested in reading some of our interactions with Hod "live", so to speak, there are stories involving Geoff's interactions with him here and here, and detailing Aurora's relationship with him here and here.

But if you're not into our stories, that's cool, we'll talk about Hod here, too! The Scion books do a really weird number on Hod, from trying to suggest that he wants to kill Baldur to demanding that Aesir Scions who don't try to kill him roll Loyalty (what? that's the exact opposite of Loyalty, dudes!). We have many opinions, because when do we not?

First of all, prior to Ragnarok, Hod is certainly around, though in what dimension is entirely up to the Storyteller. He may know he's destined to kill his brother, but until that time he hasn't actually done anything and can't be punished for a crime he has yet to commit, so just like Loki is still given free run of Asgard until such time as he starts misbehaving, so is Hod still allowed to live in his homeland. In fact, he's probably more welcomed and better-treated than Loki, considering that he's a native son of Odin and Frigg, although his blindness would make him an object of pity and/or scorn for a culture that values fighting ability above most other things. In our games, once Fimbulwinter started, Hod took to hiding in the Mirkwood in the hopes that he would be trapped there and unable to kill his brother; you might decide he does something similar, or else is still in Asgard hoping to overturn his Fate or fatalistically awaiting the day it comes for him.

As for Hod's relationship with Baldur, it's a complicated one, but hatred is probably not in the cards there. It's almost literally impossible to hate Baldur, who is the epitome of lovableness and whose Ultimate Charisma and Ultimate Appearance make him impossible to ignore or dislike even a little. Even without the strong bonds of brotherhood and family, Hod would have trouble thinking nasty thoughts about Baldur, let alone actually nursing hatred of him. On the other hand, Baldur has very concretely Done Him Wrong in taking Nanna from him to be his wife; according to the story of their awesome rivalry over the goddess, she loved Hod and he successfully fought for her and defeated Baldur, but she's now married to Baldur anyway. The Norse sagas don't explain where that switcheroo happened, so you're free to draw your own conclusions; we think it's most likely that Baldur just up and used his Ultimate Mojo on her, possibly in some kind of permanent Engender Love that left Hod utterly unable to compete with him, but it's also possible that some outside agency (Loki, is that you again?) engineered it or that Nanna has motives of her own that we don't know about. Whatever happened, the fact remains that the love of Hod's life is now his brother's wife, and that's bound to put some sour raisins into the bread pudding of his emotional state. That still doesn't override either Baldur's social mastery or Hod's own Loyalty to him, but it surely makes for a confusing and upsetting relationship between them sometimes.

It's pretty well-established in Norse myth that Hod does not kill Baldur on purpose; he's tricked into doing so by Loki, for mysterious reasons that are never fully explained (theories range from "attempting to prevent Ragnarok" to "giving Odin a big fuck you" or even "matchmakng Baldur to marry his daughter"). We don't see any reason to assume Hod would want to kill him, and although he's almost certainly extremely sad and even angry over the loss of Nanna, it's not enough of a motivation to explain him suddenly deciding to take vengeance on his brother after centuries of playing nice. What Hod is doing and feeling up to Ragnarok depends on the Storyteller, but our Hod was always pretty despondent over the idea that he was going to kill Baldur and there was nothing he could do about it, and would have loved to find a way to avoid it, just like most of the Aesir are not enthused about their eventual fates.

As for Odin... well, as you all know, Odin is more than a little bit of a humongous dick. This extends to his children as well as to everyone else; you only have to look at the stories of him cheerfully punking Thor's face off in disguise or nodding sagely as Tyr gets his hand bitten off to know that. That doesn't mean he doesn't care about them, of course, but he's always been very much about his own schemes first and foremost, and everybody's welfare somewhere a distant second. He would undoubtedly want to help his kids when they need it, provided he can do so without some kind of heinous penalty, but if there's something else he needs to be doing or helping them out would be just too much of a pain in the ass, he's likely to let them figure it out themselves rather than stepping in. He's trying to simultaneously avert Ragnarok, hold onto his own power and still have time for prankship along the way; he ain't got time for your problems right now, Bragi.

Of course, if you asked him, I'm sure he would tell you that averting Ragnarok is in everyone's best interests and he is therefore constantly working to safeguard his people. It just happens to come with the delicious side benefit of himself not getting eaten by a giant wolf. He's an altruist!

17 comments:

  1. to be fair, all the pantheon kings are dicks of one kind or another. Comes with Overthrowing you're predecessors to take control of the world.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wanted to argue with you, I really did. But you're right. They're all dicks. :(

      Delete
    2. Nuada, to my knowledge, was a perfect little angel prince starting out, but became increasingly grouchier and battle-hardened as the war dragged on, until he died.

      If he's played as still alive, you could either play him as just as jaded and battle-hardened, or maybe gone back to his perfect angel self now that his enemies have been trapped in Tartarus for centuries. Or he could just be, you know, dead.

      In which case Lugh's next in line, and while Lugh's not an asshole, he's better than you at everything and he knows it. He's that guy who takes gym class way too seriously.

      And if both of them are dead, you've got the Dagda and he's definitely an exception. :) it's unlikely that you'd have him as King though and kill off BOTH Nuada AND Lugh...and not kill off the Dagda too.

      In which case, do the Tuatha even exist for you?

      Delete
    3. Though actually, Samudra, despite John and Anne apparently playing them as dicks, I always imagined the Trimurti to be pretty benevolent and holy. Vishnu, at the very least, and Shiva has done so much to help the world at his own expense despite his whole goal being to destroy everything. But let's be fair...Indra's the actual "dick King God" of the Devas.

      Delete
    4. Indra definitely fits the 'dick king god' archetype.

      Honestly though, Jacob, if anyone among the Trimurti is a dick, it's not the Destroyer, it's the Creator. Brahma seems to be in a constant state of wanting to prove that he's every bit as important as the other two, and that never ends up well for him.

      Vishnu himself is one of the nicest guys around, but some of his Avataras have done things that are very morally suspect, such as Rama's kicking Sita out and Krishna's politicking during the Mahabharata.

      Ironically, the most unabashedly nice guy amongst the Trimurti is Shiva! Shiva's only problem really is that he has a terrible temper, and even then he's only royally lost it twice: once when Sati killed herself (and when your beloved wife is shamed in a gathering of people who you thought were friends by her own father, not one of whom stood up for her, I think losing your temper can be forgiven; he even brought the whole bunch back to life afterwards), and the second is with Ganesha (less justifiable, but let us remember there are two alternate versions of Ganesha's birth, in the first of which, Shiva doesn't know who Ganesha is, because Parvati created him parthenogenetically and forgot to tell him about it, so for all he knew she was trapped inside by a random fat kid who wouldn't let him through, and in the second of which Shiva plays no part and its all Saturn's fault), and it is clear that Shiva has been a good father after that incident.

      Shiva is the god of destruction, true, but what that means is that he is the God whose task it is to unmake the universe when it's proper time has come. He'll happily end the universe at the end of Kali Yuga, but, Kali Yuga kind of has a timetable, and it's not supposed to end for another 429000 years, give r take a decade. The Titans are bringing the end about too early, and Shiva would be the first God to try and put a stop to that.

      Delete
    5. Damn, that went on longer than I intended.

      About the Tuatha though, Lugh, a nice guy??? This is the guy who made a bunch of kids run laps around the world and still let them die!

      The Dagda though, we can both agree on :) I'm very tempted to just say that Nuada and Lugh are no longer physically perfect cuz they're dead and had to be brought back while the Dagda is perefct enough to come back to life on his own (he is the only one amongst the three who has Epic Stamina), and thus, he now rules.

      Then again, he'd probably drown Ireland in booze and ham two days into his kingship :D

      Delete
    6. the Rama kicking Sita out thing haunts him for the rest of his life, though, and it's less HIM who does it so much as him giving into pressure from the people of Ayodhya (and given that he is their King, he really ought to listen to them despite them all being dicks. And Lava and Kusha do make a point to say they are huge dicks forever.)

      (the Ramayana is the only Hindu Epic I have had the joy of being familiar with, and it's my favorite, but it's been years so I may have forgotten something)

      and as for Lugh...the kids -killed and ate his father.- The Tuatha don't have vengeance for some reason, but all the treasures and adventures in the world can't really change that. As a King, he let them work to redeem themselves. But that doesn't mean he had to save them.

      Delete
    7. You haven't forgotten the Ramayana. I, on the other hand, appear to have forgotten Irish myth, because I had honestly forgotten WHY the kids were getting punished (though, in their defence, there was no way for them to know who the pig was...was there?).

      And I will admit, most everything Krishna did was done in the service of the war, so it isn't entirely correct on my part to apply civilian morality to him (and his opponents were hardly saints themselves). I would suggest reading the Mahabharata though, especially now that Mayasura will soon be on the site...the Mahabharata has an excellent example of Mayasura using optical illusions to precipitate the battle that would kill millions all while absolutely no one thinks of him twice.

      Anyway, from the looks of this revised estimate, it looks like Brahma's the only dick amonst the Trimurti (and two outta three aint bad). :)

      Delete
    8. Yeah, I hear the Mahabharata is the big and important one (I certainly hear more people talking about Krishna than Rama.) I've been meaning to do it, but to call it 'long' would be an understatement. One of these days! Especially if the Devas end up becoming more important in my current game (which they should, I have a Scion of Shiva, but he doesn't like his character and wants to make a new one, so they might not.) :(

      Delete
    9. I wouldn't take Vishnu off the jerk list, even if you don't count the sometimes very douchey behavior of his avatars (yeah, Rama was pressured, but he still decided to be a dick to his wife, no pass from me). He's the absolute king of the "did some asura succeed at being pious and get rewarded for it? better go fuck that up immediately" move, sometimes even if the asura in question hasn't actually misbehaved. (Of course, these are stories meant to illustrate that you can't just get religious prizes if you aren't truly devout... but I totally do not believe that he doesn't enjoy going out to ruin their day.)

      And on the flip side, it's usually Brahma giving out those unnecessarily powerful boons to asuras... which I'm sure the other Devas are not a big fan of. Brahma is engaged in just constantly trolling the rest of his pantheon.

      Delete
    10. In case of most of the Asuras I'd say the havoc they were wreaking might give Vishnu a pass...and then I remember Bali (who, again, was dealt with by an Avatara of Vishnu, Vamana; this guy goes to town when he's not recognizable). Here is a guy who achieved all his conquests without any boons from Brahma, was so benevolent people in south India still worship him as a god, and a pious devotee of the gods as well, including fucking Vishnu! And what does Vishnu do? Punk him into giving it all away.

      You know, there is something seriously wrong with my religion when the guy called The Destroyer is the nicest one around :|

      Delete
    11. I guess I don't see Vishnu as a jerk so much as someone who believes very strongly in his principles and serving the greater good, whatever that may be. Yes, I guess that makes him harsh, but I don't call him a 'jerk' because I feel like he doesn't do it for his own selfish purposes, so much as him fulfilling his divine purpose.

      Rama exiled Sita under pressure, because he was their King. If he ignored his people, he'd let his relationship with his wife stand between him and his people, which wouldn't have made him a very good King. Vishnu ignored the suffering of the Untouchables despite Lakshmi's wishes because the Varnas existed for a reason - to establish order. Vishnu's job is to preserve, not to create chaos by going against the system.

      Heavy is the head who wears the crown, and that's probably why all of the King Gods are dicks, but I think we usually begrudge the King Gods who are dicks for their own selfish purposes, whereas Vishnu, if he is a dick, is only a dick because sometimes he is forced to make harsh decisions in his job.

      Delete
    12. I think most people see "being a jerk" as choosing anything else over being a good person. Vishnu has a lot of reasons for being a jerk, sometimes they are very good reasons, but that doesnt really make him not a jerk.

      Delete
  2. Don't know if he ever screwed over his own people, but talk to the people he curb stomped to get control of Ireland, if there are any left.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Every king has to look after his people first. Besides, Nuada's not even the war leader of the Tuatha, Lugh is. And even when he gets power back in peace time, he lets the defeated enemy have a quarter of the island. Compared to the other people on the list who screw around with their own pantheons Nuada is a saint.

      Delete
    2. Both true - the Tuatha freaking love Nuada because he is an awesome king to them, but he's the world's biggest jerk to the Fir Bolg, who were minding their own business when he just randomly invaded and conquered them.

      Nuada's probably at the top of my list of "pantheon kings who aren't the worst ever", too. Actually, oddly enough, Huitzilopochtli's there, too - he's killed a lot of siblings, but all in self-defense and defense of his mother, and generally seems to do all right by his people. Probably helps that he doesn't have the pater familius thing Odin does going on, though, so he has less opportunity to be a dick to his kids.

      Amaterasu would be up there, but apparently offended dignity comes before the good of the pantheon... which is not a shock, that's probably the attitude of most of the Amatsukami.

      Delete