Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Sex, Drugs and World-Threatening Destruction

Question: How much of a walking disaster is Ishtar really? Everyone loves her, but most of her stories are about her screwing people over for her own selfish reasons. Don't tell me her epic social attributes allow her to be that much of a you-know and get away with it.

Oh, but they do. That's exactly what Epic social attributes do, in fact. Ishtar is so mind-meltingly beautiful, effortlessly charming and unnoticeably convincing that it's nearly impossible to do anything but love her, no matter what she does, which is unfortunate because she is very prone to massive tantrums and destructively petulant behavior. Having the Ultimate in all three of those attributes means that Ishtar isn't just the most wonderful-seeming person you can conceive of; it means that she's literally so awesome you can't conceive of her. Her awesomeness is off the charts. It is indescribable. It goes to eleven (or twelve). Mortals just stare, drool, or fall at her feet. Scions don't do much better. Gods can deal with her, but only if they're prepared with hefty resistances of their own (and if not, they end up like hapless Enki, drunk on the floor wondering where their pants and powers went), and even the most spiritually stalwart will still want to hang out with and like her. That's what Epic socials do; they are all about getting others to want to do what you want, to love you no matter what you do and to be so distracted by your presence that they probably won't be able to remember what else was going on in the scene around them.

Gods with Ultimate socials are always out there making people do things that are against their better judgment, or using them to just roll over the competition socially when there's nothing they can do about it. Ishtar is no different, and in fact she's probably one of the pioneers of the art; whether it's stealing others' powers, attempting to kill people who have pissed her off, condemning her husband to the Underworld or throwing tantrums that terrify even Anu, she's a time bomb with a pretty face who is almost impossible to try to punish or argue with. When Ishtar's upset, everybody's upset. When Ishtar wants something, everybody falls over themselves to give it to her (unless they put up the utmost resistance, but even then they usually lose). When Ishtar decides something is going to happen, it's just easier to let her have it than to try to deal with that much Epic Charisma and Appearance being upset right in your face (not to mention the fact that she can and will break things until someone does what she wants). The only person who has ever managed to punish Ishtar is her sister Ereshkigal, an equally beautiful and terrible figure; the only person who has ever told her no is Gilgamesh, who pointed out that he didn't want to end up dead and doomed like everybody else she sleeps with.

(Interestingly, some scholars believe that Gilgamesh was homosexual and romantically attached to Enkidu as well as being his best friend - in particular, Enkidu's presence stopping Gilgamesh from exercising his right to sleep with all the ladies in the kingdom anymore and Gilgamesh's apparent lack of interest in wildly hot Ishtar are the major points of proof for this theory, though of course it's just a scholarly theory so it entirely depends on your preference for the story.)

Ishtar is actually very carefully set up as a chaotic mess in her mythology; unlike all other love goddesses, she never has any children, nor even surrogate children or beloved pets. She is specifically never allowed to fill the role of mother, because she is a cosmic figure of irresponsibility; she can be daughter, lover and even wife, but she can't take on a nurturing role because she's sort of the antithesis of nurture. Researchers have written entire dissertations on Ishtar and how she is at once the archetypal love goddess whose mold all others follow, and uniquely herself, somehow managing to have none of the fertility connotations that a sex goddess normally embodies.

So, yeah. Unfortunately for the Anunna, Ishtar is that much of a disaster and a force for chaos among them. But they love her, and they're pretty much always going to love her, so they deal with it - just like the Dodekatheon deal with Apollo's occasional rampages or the Aztlanti sigh and shake their heads over Xochiquetzal.

10 comments:

  1. I guess from a scholarly point of view Ishtar can be seen as patriarchies view of the woman unchained and uncontrollable. Today Ishtar is one of the main goddesses wicca and other goddess religions worship but back then she was the warning to men of the chaos and destruction that can occur when women gain to much power and can't be controlled. Originally Ishtar is not a feminist figure, but the reason men give for women to be kept "in place".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think there's quite a bit of truth to that; Ishtar (and similar figures like Aphrodite or the Morrigan) is a woman in a position of uncontrollable sexual power, which is historically a pretty scary idea in mythology. She could (and does) do anything that comes into her head, and the power of her almighty sexiness will let her no matter how bad an idea it is. It's not a coincidence that one of her most important myths involves her brother desperately trying to get her married off to get these shenanigans under control, or that she's later considered to have been also married to the most powerful god of the pantheon.

      Ancient societies often have a very real fear of female sexuality and power reflected in their myths. Ishtar's a stellar example.

      Delete
    2. Heh. A "stellar" example. I'm hilarious.

      Delete
    3. Gotta keep those women clothed and tied up or they might break our brains.

      Delete
  2. except as I stated in my initial post, feminists and goddess worshipers are now taking these figures and using them as feminist icons. Even lillith (who most scholars agree is Ishtar/Inanna wearing her monotheistic demon hat)is seen as a positive feminist figure as the first women within monotheism to reject patriarchy. That's the way I tend to see her, as the first woman created equal to adam who had every right to not be subordinate to him, and pretty much chuck out all the BS about her becoming a demon after she leaves him. I don't believe in Margeret Murry, but I do believe that there was more importance placed on earth mothers in early history that was supplanted by sky fathers. how much is up to debate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've actually seen some interesting scholarship suggesting that Lilith is most likely a later Jewish version of Lamashtu, a Babylonian demon-goddess responsible for a lot of blighting and baby-eating. It's just a theory, of course, but it's interesting to think about that particular myth having Babylonian roots.

      Delete
  3. Thanks for your insight for your fantastic posting. I’m glad I have taken the time to see this. Vibrator

    ReplyDelete
  4. I wanted to thank you for this excellent read!! I definitely loved every little bit of it. I have you bookmarked your site to check out the new stuff you post. https://lucy-pinder.com

    ReplyDelete
  5. hello!! Very interesting discussion glad that I came across such informative post. Keep up the good work friend. Glad to be part of your net community. ยาผู้ชาย

    ReplyDelete
  6. They may even mock the notion of sex addiction, feeling you suspect them of it and wanting to alleviate your suspicions.หนังโป๊

    ReplyDelete