Question: A few questions about the Devas: First, why does Lakshmi have Epic Intelligence? Second, have you ever considered rethinking the Deva Virtues? For a pantheon and a culture dedicated to the ideals of Dharma, Duty seems a much better fit than Order, since Dharma is much closer in meaning to duty than to any concept of mortal law. Also, it seems a bit strange that the most worshipped pantheon in the world doesn't have Piety.
Well, Lakshmi's easy, anyway. Her Epic Intelligence is included in an attempt to model her role as patron goddess of spiritual enlightenment - mental wealth, if you will, to go with her ability to grant material good luck and wealth through the Magic purview. We're not sure it's the best possible way to represent that idea, however, so if you decided to strip it from her, we wouldn't cry any tears. We often have this problem with the Devas, not to mention other eastern religions that heavily depend on ideas of enlightenment and trandscendence; there's no direct enlightenment stat, so we usually end up juggling around to see if Epic Intelligence or Mystery or Occult is a better fit, or some combination thereof. Lakshmi's connection to Intelligence is probably her weakest, and with Sarasvati already doing that for the Tridevi in spades, you may want to just ignore it.
Secondly... well, we've considered changing Virtues for everybody, although so far we've only done it in one case (giving the Yazata Order instead of Duty, because while Duty is not a bad fit for them, holy shit do those guys definitely have Order). We might at some point in the future do a serious examination of what Virtues everyone has and whether any of them need to change, but for the moment none of them are so heinously out of order that we're not getting that awesome religious flair in our games, so it's not a priority. As we talked about back when we were working on the Orisha, for most pantheons it's not really a question of finding the Virtues they espouse as much as it's one of whittling down most or all of the Virtues to find the ones they represent the most; most of the Virtues are prized by most of the pantheons to one degree or another, and that means that cutting it down to four can be challenging.
As far as dharma goes, yes, I think you're righ that Duty is a Virtue that the Devas would most definitely respect. But do they respect it more than Intellect, with their beeline focus on reaching for enlightenment and wisdom? More than Harmony, when the connection and spiritual foundation of all things in the universe is one of their religion's core tenets? More than Endurance, when marathon asceticism is their divine national sport? I think if you were going to replace anything it would probably be Order, which is in a similarly nebulous state of yes-they-like-it-but-do-they-like-it-the-most. I don't necessarily think you're wrong, actually - Duty would definitely be a good fit for them. We'll have to chew it around a bit.
Piety, however, naw. While having pious worshipers is great, it doesn't necessarily translate to the gods themselves having Piety, if you see what I mean. Pantheons like the Anunna have Piety because they genuinely believe they're the supreme powers of the universe and that all other gods owe their existence to them, while pantheons like the Tuatha de Danann have Piety because they're so supremely dedicated to the idea of their own importance that they have no moral problems whatsoever setting up divine shop in places that clearly don't belong to them, because obviously Ireland being Tuatha-controlled is way more awesome than it remaining with whatever second-stringers owned it previously. The Devas are certainly fans of themselves, especially the big triads, but they're lacking that fanatical devotion to the Devas above all other things; their religion actually suggests that all gods of all pantheons are really the same when you get down to the cosmic principles of things, and in their earliest stories they even acknowledge another pantheon, the asuras, as their equals.
Theoretically, every pantheon has at one time or another had an insanely pious core base of people who believed in them utterly, wholeheartedly and above other gods. But while the inclinations of a pantheon's home culture do help shape their Virtue setup, if we used that as our yardstick everybody would just have Piety.
Ah, I see what you were going for with Lakshmi. I still think Intelligence is not the best way to represent that facet of her character (I'm not a big fan of the Dagda having it either), but I can respect your line of reasoning (especially since just Occult doesn't seem to do it justice and she sure as all Naraka doesn't have Mystery).
ReplyDeleteAs for the second part, I never suggested replacing anything other than Order with Duty. While the Manusmritis and other books of law were important to the ancient Indians, I can tell you as a Hindu and an Indian that the concept of carrying out your sacred responsibilities, in the form of your Dharma, is much more integral to the culture even today than following mortal laws. Order is not what stops Kali from stomping all over Shiva, her Duty as his consort does, to just give one example. Hell, Kali's sense of Duty is probably the only thing keeping her from becoming completely uncontrollable (she's rather like Sangria in this regard).
I understand that if you ever decide to change it (or not change it), you will have done your research and come to the best possible decision, but till then, those were just my two cents.
As for the third part, thanks a lot or the Piety explanation. Piety kinda always struck me as the Illusion of Virtues...I had no idea exactly how to justify which pantheons liked themselves enough to have it. This helps a lot!
Yeah, I think you make good points all around. I'm pretty sure I don't like Intelligence on Lakshmi anymore, and Duty is a compelling Virtue for these guys.
DeleteKali and Sangria sadly have a whole lot in common.