Monday, April 30, 2012

The Slavic Soul

Question: What do you think it is about the Slavic Gods that people seem to never come to a consensus about their PSP? The 'official' version is Duality (which isn't about Duality), but you guys went with Dvoeverie and there's also Prav, Bhag and Pravda. Seems like the Slavs have a lot of stuff going on.

It's not really so much something about the Slavic gods as it is the lack of good information in English on Slavic religion that gets people so topsy-turvy on the whole thing. The Slavs have precious little in the way of written record, and most of their information comes from folktales, scholar reconstructions and archaeological finds; trying to pull a coherent cultural idea suitable for a PSP out of that is a difficult task.

Duality, unfortunately, is a mess of an idea, which is why we discounted it out of hand. Not only do I suspect that the gravitation toward it is in part due to Neil Gaiman's treatment of Czernobog and Bielebog in American Gods (which is awesome, but also full of expected fictionalization), but it's such a widespread concept that it feels crazy to try to tie it to any one culture. The Slavs certainly aren't the owners of duality - they're not even the strongest practitioners of it, not with the Yazata standing, like, right there (and many scholars are of the strong opinion that much of the Slavic duality that is present in myth is borrowed from rubbing elbows with Persia anyway). It's an idea that really doesn't capture the spirit of the Slavic people or myths, and that wasn't very well executed, in my opinion, as a PSP anyway (though I respect later fan attempts to fix it).

Prav (and Pravda), unfortunately, doesn't do much better for me. I'm in total agreement that it's a concept that makes much more sense as a PSP than does Duality, but the problem is that it's a concept that was invented very, very recently by Slavic neopagans. Prav, as the concept of the righteous law of Svarog that binds the world together, was invented by the Book of Veles, a widely-discredited forgery from the 1950s that contains a lot of material that never appears anywhere else in Slavic myth. While the word prav does, indeed, mean law or rightness in various Slavic languages, we don't have any evidence of it as any kind of religious or cosmic concept that ties into the culture's myths. I don't feel a lot more of a focus on law and order among the Slavic gods and myths than any other - again, there are other pantheons that more embody that idea, like the law-obsessed Celestial Bureaucracy or the order-and-stability-focused Anunna. (For what it's worth, however, the Prav in the Fan-Written Resources thread over at the forums is a better attempt at coherently working with this idea than the Prav and Pravda on the Scion wiki, and its focus on Virtues is something we also did a lot with for Dvoeverie.)

Bhag is more of a weird mixed bag of a purview, because it's actually much closer to Indian than it is to Slavic. Bhag is a proto-Indo-European word, etymologically identical to the Sanskrit bhaj, meaning to portion out or allot. It, along with svarga, which the half-treatment on the Slavs in the Scion book suggests as a name for the Overworld, is borrowed directly from the Indian language and culture, where Svarga is indeed an Overworld, owned by Indra and a destination for pious Hindu souls. The words eventually found their way to the Slavs through the Persians, and are loanwords that don't really connect to their own ancient concepts; referring to heaven as "svarga" is actually a fairly recent development, as it's the word chosen to represent the Christian Heaven. What this all boils down to for Bhag (which is a weird little purview having to do with good luck that looks like it belongs in Ganesha's bag of tricks more than anywhere else) is that it comes from a lot of outside syncretic sources and is sort of floating around, unconnected to the Slavs in more than peripheral ways. A PSP needs to be the core essence of a pantheon, not an idea that linguistically might have been associated with them sometimes in the areas where they were influenced by someone else.

But the issue remains, after you clear all of those away, that it's still really difficult to come up with what, exactly, the defining power and cultural facet of the Slavic gods really is. In the end, we chose dvoeverie because it seemed to collect most of the things that the other PSPs were trying to do, and because it was a uniquely Slavic concept that has always been bound up in their religious practice and life. The Slavs live at the crossroads of the world and have been invaded, conquered, befriended and traded with more than anyone else, and somehow they have endured with their unique cultural flavor no matter whether the Celts, Germans, Persians, Greeks, or later the hordes of Catholicism were in charge. Their ability (documented historically) to worship more than one set of gods without any qualm, despite the apparent conflicts and overlaps between the two that sent other cultures into fits at the idea, represents an impressive ability to remain true to their core values no matter what's going on. And the gods of these people, already notoriously harmoniously associated with the natural world and its rhythms, could not help but be as flexible.

So Dvoeverie it is, for us. Nothing else struck us as simultaneously quintessentially Slavic, religiously significant and historically verifiable.

14 comments:

  1. My understanding of Slavic mythology largely does stem from reading all the fairytales and folk stories I can find. The lack of really good resources on the actual pre-Christian religion makes it harder for me to review that. I'm pretty good on Slavic architecture (fascinating!) and art, but not as strong on the cultural history surrounding it.

    The reason I settled on Prav (I wrote that, and asked the question) was a recurring theme in Slavic stories. It basically boils down to "don't be an ass, or else." Whenever someone breaks their promises or does something underhanded and dastardly, the story ends up punishing them in some horrible, horrible way.

    I didn't really see Prav as "law" like the rules and clauses of the Bureaucracy, but instead more of an understood behavior code. In Scion, that's basically Virtues. The Slavic stories are always, always huge on the Virtues. It just made sense that their PSP should be based on drawing power from their Virtues.

    I acknowledge your point about Slavs being very much able to retain their identity in the face in invading, conflicting forces. The Chinese did that, too. And the Egyptians. I'm not saying it's as generic as Duality, but when I think of the Slavs, I don't immediately think of their cultural flexiblity. I do think of a strong committment to their own values and an unwillingness to compromise those values. They can acknowledge other values, but they won't break their own.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But the problem when you can only get sources of folktales and fairytales is that they often dont represent the rules the gods live by. Instead they represent the rules the gods make humans live by. It doesnt make sense to me to have a psp be about all the things the mortals and heroes do, as oppose to the things the gods are known to do.

      Delete
    2. Some of the Downgraded Gods seem to hold to Prav though

      Delete
    3. I see what you're saying, but I guess I don't see where that's a uniquely (or at least uniquely strong) Slavic trait. "Don't do bad stuff or the universe/gods will punish you" is pretty standard fare the world over. Don't run your mouth or the Dodekatheon will smite you. Don't ask for more than you should or the Devas will ruin you. Don't try to get out of doing your duty or the Aztlanti will wreck your shit. They're all expressions of their Virtues, which every pantheon has.

      I was thinking about you when I was writing this, because I knew you'd written one of the versions of Prav (the one I like better, incidentally). It's not that I think it's not pretty well-built as a PSP - it's just that it doesn't ring true to me as a real essence-of-Slavs kind of theme.

      Delete
    4. I actually like your choice better, but I can honestly see where Prav is coming from(conversely one of my fellow players was all "how can synchretism be a PSP everyone does that!". Of course sometimes I wonder if PSPs are even the best thing to use instead of perhaps making certain purviews banned from Pantheons..

      Delete
    5. Mm, I would never ban purviews from playable pantheons. Scions are by nature trying to be new gods of new things - telling them they can't do something just because nobody else has done it yet goes severely against the grain there. Part of Scion's charm for me is that even if you choose a parent with certain proclivities, you're always free to branch out and become whatever you want at any time - I'd never want to limit that.

      Delete
    6. Well Psps already sort of do that, you can't have a Shen with Arete for example. I briefly thought it might work better instead of having "everyone has something they are good at" it being some things are just outside their world. But as you said that leads to its own issues.

      Delete
    7. There is indeed almost always a bit of bleed when it comes to PSPs. Nothing is really "unique" to any culture. The power of names isn't unique to Egypt, animism isn't unique to Japan, greatness isn't unique to the Greeks.

      What makes a PSP that Pantheon's signature is that it's a fundamental aspect of their culture and their collective identity. Sure, lots of people are great at being good, but it practically DEFINES the Greeks. Sure, lots of places had blood sacrifice, but the Meso-americans did it bigger and badder than anyone else.

      I just can't find my way to agreeing with Anne that the biggest, most defining trait of the Slavic culture is that they adapt to other cultures while remaining themselves. That's cool, because I totally get where she's coming from, but I just don't agree.

      While the theme of universal punishment pops up everywhere, the adherence to a code of conduct is really, really hammered home by the Slavic stories. The irish? They're all about cheating whenever they can. They're a giant bag of double-talking dicks. The Greeks? Sneaky bastards! The Norse might try the straight forward method first, but trickery and guile are right there on the back burner, ready to be whipped out at the first sign of trouble.

      The Slavs don't tend to do that. I may be working from incomplete sources (I am totally doing that), but my firm impression of their mythology is that they do things The Right Way. Even the bad guys. The other Pantheons love their Virtues, but the Slavs are so in love with their Virtues it's crazy.

      There are aspects of that in Dvoeverie, like the ability to learn the 6th dot of a Virtue (also appears in Prav) and messing around a lot with Virtues in general. I just can't see the Slavs being themselves when they're adopting outside influences every time they turn around. They do, sure, but the core of what they are remains.

      Delete
    8. I dunno - there's definitely plenty of sneakery and rules-breaking among the Bogovi, even those who should know better. Stribog steals Radegast's cloak of stars to trick Chors into sleeping with him instead of the night god she's so partial to, Veles kidnaps Perun's son to raise him as his own for no apparent reason other than jealousy, and Svarozhich circumvents his own rules and changes the laws of mortality themselves by stealing the honey of immortality to make Pizamar into a goddess so he can have sex with her without technically being illegal. The Bogovi themselves are frequently pissing Svarozhich off by breaking the prohibition against meddling in the world to create new cults and worshipers for themselves. There's an emphasis on following the rules, but these are not gods I would necessarily associate with always doing that.

      Delete
  2. Veles is perfectly justified in stealing Perun's kid. Perun stole his wife/cattle/something first!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Heh, I'm absolutely sure he would see it that way and probably testify, too. :)

      Delete
    2. More seriously I thought that was the point of the Perun/Veles cycle they take stuff back and forth from eachother all the time.

      Delete
    3. It's hard to tell because so much of it is tentatively reconstructed, but they do seem to have a pretty epic rivalry. I believe Mokosh, who some scholars think is Perun's wife but Veles' lover (the earth goddess as intermediary between the heavens and the underworld), is another bone of contention between them.

      Delete
  3. Im not sure you are using the correct word "justified".

    ReplyDelete